focusing: to bend all incident light appearing on a subject into one cohesive image

Comments

Post a Comment

firstly, thanks in advance for your comment - I don't get very many, so I'm sure to follow up if you leave me a way - secondly, come again.

Popular posts from this blog

SharePoint Jokes

What do you call a smiling, SOBER courteous person at a SharePoint conference? A: The caterer. Light travels faster than sound. This is why some SharePoint consultants appear bright until you hear them speak. A good SharePoint consultant is someone who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. How many SharePoint consultants does it take to screw in a light bulb? How many can you afford? I always take SharePoint with a grain of salt, ...plus a slice of lemon, ...and a shot of tequila. Client says to SharePoint consultant - Well aren't you a waste of two billion years of evolution. SharePoint: working daily to make the human brain obsolete. I told my boss that everyone hates SharePoint. He said I was being ridiculous… everyone hasn't used it yet. SharePoint work is something you do that nobody notices until you don't do it. Top three things SharePoint Consultant won't say: You're right; we're billing way too much for...
Read more

Why numbering should begin at zero

Image
To denote the subsequence of natural numbers 2, 3, ..., 12 without the pernicious three dots, four conventions are open to us a) 2 ≤  i  < 13 b) 1 <  i  ≤ 12 c) 2 ≤  i  ≤ 12 d) 1 <  i  < 13 Original Note by  Dijkstra Are there reasons to prefer one convention to the other? Yes, there are. The observation that conventions a) and b) have the advantage that the difference between the bounds as mentioned equals the length of the subsequence is valid. So is the observation that, as a consequence, in either convention two subsequences are adjacent means that the upper bound of the one equals the lower bound of the other. Valid as these observations are, they don't enable us to choose between a) and b); so let us start afresh. There is a smallest natural number. Exclusion of the lower bound —as in b) and d)— forces for a subsequence starting at the smallest natural number the lower bound as mentioned into the realm of the unnatural numbe...
Read more